Skip to main content

Differentiation in the classroom

A student-led classroom is one where students play an integral part in decision-making. Coming up with essential agreements, deciding what homework to do, and planning the unit of inquiry, are various ways students can take charge. The support  and guidance of their teacher is ofcourse, a critcal factor.

Well then, how about differentiation?

We create pre-assements and formative assessments in order to gauge our students' understanding. What if the assesments are not good enough to gauge where the students are? Knowing that assessments are completely subjective, (however hard we try to be objective), shouldn't the students decide where they are in a continuum, and place themselves in different groups? Many children in my class do not speak English at home.Their inability to understand a maths word problem in English (and thereby getting the sum wrong), can give a false picture of that child's grasp of the concept.

In the video. my students have decided where they are according to a continuum:

The experts were ready to be challenged and stood firmly in their group when the other students asked them whether they were prepared to tackle a tough word problem based on Area and Perimeter.
The ones who needed help, raised their hands. I observed that no one felt embarrased and knew that they felt safe and secure being in this group. The ones in the middle group knew exactly where they needed help, or simply did not have enough confidence in themselves. So this factor needed to be addressed. What was stopping them from joining the expert group?

In the video, I asked the experts to help the ones who needed help. I encouraged the middle group to figure out what was bothering them. This is the group I will sit with in the next 15 minutes.
I will eventually give them an exit slip to fill. The results will help them decide whether they want to move on from their group.


Often different cultural habits and behaviours can come in the way of a teacher however good his or her intention. The children know best where they stand. Do they feel secure? Are they ready to be challenged? They can tell you if you let them. Stand back and embrace their ideas the next time you want to differentiate. It is infinitely rewarding. How do you differentiate in the classroom? Do share.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Jennifer FentonMarch 8, 2012 at 5:13 AM

    Great idea, Naini. We spend a great deal of time discussing ways in which to empower students and encourage them to have a voice in their learning. This seems like a natural extension of the idea. Love your post ~ it has me thinking!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to read my blog.

Popular posts from this blog

Generalization-Designing Your Lessons for Conceptual Understanding (Part 3)

This post is the third of our blog post series on how to design lessons for conceptual understanding. Part 1 here Part 2 here Strategy 3 : Generalizations You may have come across Lynn Erickson's diagram on the structure of knowledge. In my IB workshop's I always like to present the avocado model alongside this diagram when I am talking about facts. The intention of inquiry-based teaching and conceptually-driven understanding (or Concept-based inquiry- whatever terminology suits your fancy)  is to enable students to make generalizations. In other words, can they transfer their learning to a new context because they have understood what they learnt.  In order to make generalizations, we need to first plan lessons that help students acquire facts/topics that are interesting  and worth knowing. Bringing in local and global issues that are relevant to the topic help students as they begin to compare the topics and see emerging patterns. Remember, facts and concepts have a syn...
Post a Comment
Read more

Classification -Designing Your Lessons for Conceptual Understanding (Part 1)

In this series, we will discuss how we can design lessons for conceptual understanding. Having recently completed an upskilling course with IB, I felt we may all benefit from looking at some of these strategies and how they might look like in our PYP classrooms. Strategy 1: Classification    Source: Ibo.org In this post, I will be focusing on the research-backed strategy, "classification".  Chadwick (2009) highlights that classification helps develop conceptual understanding by allowing students to organize information, recognize patterns, and understand relationships among concepts.  Here are some examples across several disciplines on how I have used tools to classify. Math Class 1) In my math class (Grade 3) instead of having students simply rote learn the names of the shapes and their properties, have them sort the shapes  based on the number of sides, angles and symmetry. Even better, use the Concept Attainment Strategy (I keep returning to this strategy be...
Post a Comment
Read more

Concepts-In-Use: Designing your lessons for Conceptual Understanding (Part 6)

  Concepts-In Use www.ibo.org In this post, one more strategy takes center stage when it comes to designing lessons that aid conceptual understanding in our students: Concept-In-Use. This strategy should be used once several concepts have been covered in class.  A great way to know whether your students are internalizing the concepts is to ask them to explain the connections between two concepts. For example:  In Math Ask them to convert a fraction to a percentage.  Or a percentage to a decimal.  Can they clearly explain the connection?  Can they use drawings to support their explanation? Can they articulate the difference between a prism and a pyramid.  How are they same?  How are they different? How can you represent data visually?  Bar graphs, pictographs, line charts are all concepts. As a designer of conceptual lessons, a teacher needs to be keenly aware of the connections between concepts.  For instance, is the Grade 3 teacher awar...
Post a Comment
Read more